powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
 Sports News
Home    Fantasy    NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Horses  |  MMA  |  More
CBS College  |  High School  |  Mobile  |  Shop
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community

Arno

Global View

Name: Private | Gender: Private | Member Since January 15, 2008
Current Level: All-Star | Email: Private
Favorite
Teams
Blog Home

No Equality in the Eternal City

Posted on: May 6, 2008 2:47 pm
Edited on: May 7, 2008 1:28 pm

First off, last week I wrote : Nadal will win again in Barcelona next week, unless David Ferrer can play his best for two sets in the final.

Ferrer played well in the second set, Nadal won in three. Not bragging, just saying. He makes it so easy though. As long as he is healthy, he’ll keep winning on clay, in Rome this week, Hamburg next week and in Paris in June. He has never lost more than one set in a match at Roland-Garros.

Andy Roddick made his 2008 debut on clay this morning in Rome, with an easy win over his friend Mardy Fish. Roger Federer and Nadal have already played two tournaments on the red dirt. The French Open has never been Roddick’s priority. He is 4-7 lifetime there.

Federer could face David Ferrer in the quarterfinals, Novak Djokovic or David Nalbandian in the semis and Nadal in the final. That’s one heavy bracket.

This was true until Wednesday when Ferrer, Nalbandian and Nadal lost to Radek Stepanek -- one big upset --, Nicolas Almagro and Juan Carlos Ferrero --another very big upset--.

It may not be an excuse, let's call it an explanation, Nadal was hampered by massive blisters under his right foot. He received treatment at 1-4 in the second set and went on to lose the final games.

Almagro has been playing very well on clay this year. He beat Nalbandian in the final in Acapulco, Mexico, in March.

 

A few months ago, I wrote Parity, Stupidity which you can still read here.

The men play a Masters Series event in Rome, Italy this week. They will be in Hamburg, Germany, next week, for another clay court Masters Series tournament, the last of three this year. The Masters Series are the ATP Tour top tier events.

The women play a Tier I event in Berlin, Germany, this week and will be in Rome netx week, for another Tier I tournament. The Tier I classification is the highest on the WTA Tour.

Only the Grand Slam events, which are run by the International Tennis Federation (ITF), rank higher in the world of tennis.

 The total purse for each of the two Masters Series events is nearly US$ 3,520,000 (€2,270,000). While on the women’s side the total prize money for each of the two events is US$1,340,000.

I don’t know if the difference is justified. I haven’t talked to the organizers or the sponsors or the Tours about it. My point is that we are far from the parity much heralded by the WTA Tour CEO Larry Scott.

The only joint tournament which men and women don’t play the same week that offers equal prize money is the “The Barclays Dubai Tennis Championships” in the United Arab Emirates.

Category: Tennis
Tags: Rome, Tennis
Reputation: 94
Level: All-Star
Since: Dec 13, 2006
Posted on: May 6, 2008 3:22 pm

No Equality in the Eternal City

Parity in pay is an interesting question.  Why shouldn't the women get paid as much as the men?   Let's also ask the question why don't the doubles tournaments pay twice as much as the singles tournaments?  I don't have the figures at hand but I am going to assume that twice as many people are involved in doubles.  They should be paid twice as much.  Instead they are paid much less.   I am guessing that more people follow the men's tournament than the women. I don't doubt that more people watch the singles than the doubles.  I don't have attendance figures at hand.  Do they publish stats on attendance figures broken down by women's and men's matches.  Personally, i would rather watch the Bryan brothers play than Federer.  I would rather watch Henin play Serena than Nadal versus Ferrer.  I am used to swimming upstream.  What do the numbers say?  If the attendance for the women overall equals that of the men then a change in pay would be warranted.  If not then a change in pay would be a crime.  The one who draws the most should get paid the most.



About Global View
Busting fallacies because there may be several opinions but there is only one truth.
Recent Blog Entries
Global View
CBS Sports Blogs
Arno's Favorites
No Favorites

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com